1 month ago // 140702 // reblog
"Fun fact, Rose’s Bechdal test score would have been in the 80′s were it not for the episodes Moffat wrote during her run."
Guys, really, you should click the link.
“Ironically, the woman who is often propped up as proof that Steven Moffat is, in fact, not a sexist was one of the worst in terms of the Bechdel test and overall independence of thought and character. While maintaining an average speaking time, the episodes she is in only pass the Bechdel Test 57% of the time, and she herself only passes 42% of the time. She also never passes it on her own after Series 5. It is also important to note that River’s “passes” barely scraped by this test. Her passing conversations were always around three or four lines of exchange total, limited to one per episode, and were always in the presence of/with the Doctor.”
1 year ago // 130610 // reblog
sad about matt smith leaving
sadder about steven moffat staying
Steven Moffat on Female Characters. (x)
Think about this next time you decide to praise his “not sexist” writing.
“There’s this issue you’re not allowed to discuss: that women are needy. Men can go for longer, more happily, without women. That’s the truth. We don’t, as little boys, play at being married - we try to avoid it for as long as possible. Meanwhile women are out there hunting for husbands.”1 year ago // 130318 // reblog
1 year ago // 120906 // reblog
1 year ago // 120902 // reblog
Warning: total spoilers.
I hadn’t planned on watching Doctor Who tonight for the same reason that I didn’t watch the most recent Christmas special, viz: a complete lack of faith in Steven Moffat’s ability to competently write and manage the series. My husband, however, was curious, with the result that we sat down to watch it over dinner. And even though the end result was just as frustrating as I’d feared it would be, having gone to the effort of watching, it seems wrong (or at least, deeply uncharacteristic) not to bother with analysing why.
Thus, I bring you Asylem of the Daleks: a review in three parts.
This one. Like… really? I can’t believe anyone actually fell for that.
If the grammar and capitalization didn’t tip you off, the “probably deleting this right after posting it” should’ve been a dead giveaway…2 years ago // 120202 // reblog
2 years ago // 120202 // reblog
laughing so hard at the people who actually believe that moffat tweet was legit
guys do you even LOOK at his twitter, he uses proper capitalization/punctuation and would not use that sort of phrasing in a million years, that quote would look right at home on a teenage girl’s tumblr, not on the twitter feed of a 50-year-old male acclaimed television writer
Oh my god.
I love how people actually think that tweet from Moffat is real.
Why does it have 4,000 notes.
Oh my god.2 years ago // 120202 // reblog
Steven Moffat regarding Sherlock (via ununpentium)
“Surely you must have learned by now not to try and predict us. We deliberately lie, we deliberately confuse in order to keep you in the dark about our intentions.”2 years ago // 120118 // reblog
Okay listen, everyone needs to calm down about the American/CBS Sherlock Holmes adaptation.
Am I expecting to like it? No.
Do I think it will be any good? Not really, but I haven’t seen it so I can’t say for sure.
I can say with confidence that it won’t be as good as BBC’s Sherlock, but that’s just because, as far as I’m concerned, no TV show has ever been as good as BBC Sherlock. And yes, I mean ever.
MY POINT IS, however, that people need to stop freaking out and saying that CBS is stealing the idea from Moffat and Gatiss because, um, no. Maybe they were inspired by it, sure. But they did not by any means “steal the idea.”
First of all, Sherlock Holmes has been around since… what, 1887? The original stories were set in contemporary times. So, the idea of doing a “modern Sherlock Holmes”? That was Arthur Conan Doyle’s idea.
"But Sarah, all the other adaptations before Sherlock were set in the time period the original books were set in, Moffat and Gatiss were the first ones to adapt it into modern times."
Wrong again. Moffat and Gatiss have actually cited (I believe in a commentary, or maybe a making of video, I honestly can’t remember) that they were inspired by the Basil Rathbone Sherlock Holmes films that were set in contemporary times. So, CBS is not stealing from Moffat and Gatiss any more than Moffat and Gatiss are stealing from Universal Pictures.
So sit down, and shut up. I’m not asking you to like it. Once the show airs, I invite you to go ahead and pick it apart and point out all the little things that are wrong with it, as I’m sure there will be numerous problems. But don’t be so ignorant as to suggest that Moffat and Gatiss have some god-given right to modernizing Sherlock Holmes.
And remember - Sherlock Holmes has probably been adapted more than any other literary character. You do not own Sherlock Holmes. This fandom does not own Sherlock Holmes. This will not be the first shitty (or mediocre, or just okay) Sherlock Holmes adaptation, nor will it be the last. So if you don’t like it… just leave it. It’s not worth the time and effort you will expend getting upset about it. If you like it, great! Fantastic! Go on liking it, and don’t worry that you’re betraying Mofftiss or something. If you hate it, don’t freak out or run to tumblr to shit on other people’s joy. Just relax and pop in your Sherlock DVDs and all will be right with the world.2 years ago // 120117 // reblog
Show co-creator Steven Moffat said there was a good explanation for Sherlock’s survival - and all the clues were in the episode.
‘It’s all set up. We just want people to be in a frenzy of speculation.’
But he added that he would not be revealing any more clues, and added: ‘We’re going to be complete bastards about it.’” 2 years ago // 120117 // reblog
FDSALKFHALHDAS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!2 years ago // 120116 // reblog
You motherfucking troll.2 years ago // 120116 // reblog
Sarah Anne. 23. INTJ.
I like Disney, Hannibal, the Beatles, FC Bayern, and Star Trek TOS. And some other things. Like probably three other things. ~ ♦
1 of 2 →